Thursday, October 16, 2008
Dangerous To The Constitution
If Obama were elected, we could count on having a Liberal, anti-Constitution, activist Supreme Court for the next 30 to 40 years!
To illustrate, just a couple of months ago, the Supreme Court upheld the right to keep and bear arms by only a 5 to 4 margin.
Do you understand what that means?! It means that 4 out of 5 Supreme Court Justices actually were willing to deny the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution!
Why? It's because Liberal Judges don't care about the Constitution. Or in their words, the Constitution is a "living" "evolving" document. And Obama agrees with them.
What's the big deal? It means that the balance of power between the Legislative Branch and the Judicial branch is in grave danger, because THE COURT IS ACTUALLY MAKING LAWS, instead of "interpreting" the Constitution, like it's supposed to.
At the Saddleback Forum, when Obama was asked what Supreme Court Justices he would not want on the bench, he said Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas (Conservative Justices who uphold the Constitution).
Think about that a minute...If Scalia and Thomas had been replaced by two Liberal Justices that Obama would choose, the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms would have gone down in flames! Not with a Constitutional amendment (the proper way to change the Constitution), but with Liberal activist Judges in effect making a law exactly opposite the Constitution.
You may not care about the 2nd Amendment (you should), but just think if the Court decided against something that you DID care about?
What if they decided to take away your freedom of speech? Or religion? Or right to assemble? Or the right to your home and property? Believe me, some of these have already been done in some cases.
Obama is dangerous to the Constitution.
NEW-- Listen to this amazing video and be amazed! Obama says the Constitution reflects "the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day". No wonder he wants to subvert it.